The Race Relations Act and what it entails

Recently, no doubt due to the turmulous turn of events within Malaysia, some of which involve ethnicity, a Race Relations Act had been proposed. The justification? Relations between different ethnic groups had deteriorated to an alarming rate, and despite there being a plethora of powerful legislation at the Government’s disposal (the Sedition Act 1948 and the Internal Security Act 1960 among them) there has yet to be enacted law to govern how conduct between different races should be held.

This proposal had, as reported today, been accepted by the Cabinet. Syed Hamid Syed Albar, Malaysia’s Home Minister, was quoted as saying in that report that the proposed Act would include, among other things, touch on race relations through the economic, education and distribution systems, as well as what he termed “provisions on punative action” using the Federal Constitution as the guideline. Britain, he further elaborated, had the Act for many years, and that the British Act would be used as a reference, along with other European laws, in the drafting of the Act. Given that it seems that Malaysia will have such legislation, we of Reading Law feel it only appropriate to do our patriotic duty, and enlighten kindred souls on what exactly such an Act would encapsulate, using of course the British version of the legislation as our guideline, as well.

Britain’s Race Relations Act 1976 is a restatement of earlier Acts passed in 1965 and 1968. The long title of the Act states that it is “An Act to make fresh provision with respect to discrimination on racial grounds and relations between people of different racial groups…” and sure enough a cursory glance through the Act as it is divided into Parts deal with discrimination. Discrimination in the course of employment, in the carrying out of trade, in education, etc. Basically the key word here is discrimination, based upon race, and by virtue of Amentment Regulations of 2003, upon religious grounds as well. Syed Hamid had said that the Federal Constitution would be used as a guide, and in this light, regard is likely to be made to Article 8’s protection of equality before the law. Considering special provisions for the protection of the native Malay population enshirined in Article 153 of the Constitution, it is likely that the Act would contain a number of exceptions, for example, in the field of Malay Reservation Enactments of the States of West Malaysia, as well as institutional safeguards enacted persuant to the said Article, for example, the University Teknologi MARA Act.

The British Race Relations Act also established the Commission for Racial Equity (now the Commission for Equity and Human Rights) whose duty it was to ensure that discrimination on the basis of race was kept to a bare minimum, however it is unlikely that the enactment of such an Act here in Malaysia would result in the creation of a similar Commission.

In any event, it is crucial to note that this Act does not contain any “punative provisions” as envisaged by Syed Hamid, at least, not of the sort that supporters of this Act in Malaysia are likely to want to see, given the controversy that first led to the suggestion of this Act (no link given, do your own research to find out what, hint: google “Ahmad Ismail”) and for such provisions it is submitted that the authorities might find inspiration from a seperate UK statute, namely the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006, which amended the Public Order Act 1986 of the UK to introduce a Part within the Act dealing with incitement to hate towards persons of particular race and religion. Indeed the subject matter of this latter Act is most apt to deal with any utterances of ill will that target individuals or groups based on their ethnicity, so the Government might want to consider enacting this Act as well, or even instead.

(Postscript: Britain’s Race Relations Act 1976 has been repealed following the introduction of a new comprehensive law on equality, the Equality Act 2010. – 19/5/2010)


4 Responses to The Race Relations Act and what it entails

  1. Alistaire says:

    The following is a letter I sent to both the New Straits Times and The Star on the 19th September 2008, and it was pubished by The Star in modified form on the 22nd September 2008 here:


    Dear Editor,

    This is in reference to your report “Race Relations Act gets Cabinet
    nod” dated September 19, 2008.

    In that article, Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar was quoted
    as saying that the cabinet had agreed to look into a law to govern
    race relations and that his ministry would be working together with
    the Unity, Culture, Arts and Heritage Ministry to draft the proposed
    Race Relations Act. In doing so, he added that these ministries might
    be looking at the laws of other countries, in particular the United
    Kingdom. The purpose of such legislation would, according to the
    Government, to combat increasingly fragile relations between the
    different races of the country, particularly as of late.

    Indeed the United Kingdom already had a Race Relations Act since 1976.
    A closer examination of that Act, however, reveals that its primary
    purpose is limited in scope to discrimination (for example,
    discrimination on grounds of race in the course of employment), and
    does not cover any incitement to any hatred based on religion or race.

    As such, I would propose that rather then looking at merely that Act
    alone, the Government would do well to look at another piece of UK
    legislation recently passed by their Parliament, namely the Racial and
    Religious Hatred Act 2006. The long title of that Act is “An Act to
    make provision about offences involving stirring up hatred against
    persons on racial or religious grounds.” It is contended that this
    Act, rather then the Race Relations Act, is more appropriate given the
    tendency of certain segments of the populace taking advantage of the
    current domestic political impasse to spread ill will amongst the
    different ethnic groups of Malaysia. I hope the enactment of this Act
    in particular, along with the Race Relations Act, can be considered by
    the relevant ministries as well.

  2. drammaspag says:

    omg.. good work, man

  3. Loveblog says:

    Thanks for visiting my blog . Yours is pretty interesting too!

  4. Sarah says:

    Dear Administrator,

    Greeting from eLawyer.

    We are holding the first of its kind legal blog writing competition for lawyers and law students as well as bloggers.

    Hence, we would be glad if you could help us to publish, announce or forward emails about this Legal Blog Writing Contest and circulate among the law students and bloggers.

    Please click the link below for more information.

    What is is a Malaysian law portal designs for the lawyers & the legal industry in Malaysia and there are features such as:

    – Law Jobs & Resume
    – Law Books for Sale & wanted
    – Law Resources – links to Malaysian cases, statutes, forms & precedent etc.
    – Legal Fees Calculator
    – Law News and more

    Please do not hesitate to contact us at 03-27825399 if you have any queries pertaining this matter.

    Thank you very much. Your assistance is much appreciated.

    “Helping Lawyers Succeed Online”
    33B, Jalan Merak 2A, Bdr Puchong Jaya, 47100, Puchong, Selangor.

    Tel: 03-2782 5399
    Email:, or

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: